Hence if the receiver can see enough satellites it can perform Time Difference of arrival measurements which can remove the large error. Hence if there is a built in error, the measurements can be collected and adjusted so that it is essentially the same offset error on the receiver for each satellite (not quite that simple, but thats the idea). But even though the GPS receiver is measuring 4-9 different signals with poor accuracy, it is the SAME receiver measuring the signals from different satellites. The GPS satellites are calibrated to send highly accurate time and location measurements.a LOT better than 30 nsecs and they are constantly monitored and corrected to maintain the accuracy. Low cost GPS receivers are not that accurate however (typically ~30nsecs), but they take advantage of a trick. Hence if we want to accurately locate ourselves to around 1m, then we are going to require a receiver that can at least determine time to ~ 3 nanoseconds or better. The researchers published their findings May 6 in the journal Physical Review X.We have to be very careful how we understand this time accuracy issue. "It’s like the Industrial Revolution at the nanoscale." "We now have so much control over these tiny devices, and are able to measure them with so much precision, that we’re rediscovering thermodynamics at a completely new scale." Ares said. "It might not always be a linear relationship for other clocks, but it does look like the accuracy is bounded by the laws of thermodynamics."Īsides from being useful for designing clocks and other devices in the future, the researchers view their findings as laying the groundwork for further exploration of how the large scale laws of thermodynamics apply to tiny nanosized devices. "We don’t know for certain yet, but what we’ve found - for both our clock and for quantum clocks - is that there’s a proportional relationship between accuracy and entropy," Ares said. What's that? Your physics questions answered 18 times quantum particles blew our minds The biggest unsolved mysteries in physics Perhaps if clocks didn’t produce any entropy, they’d be just as likely to run backwards as they do forwards, and the more entropy they generate the more they’re protected from stutters and backwards fluctuations. Seeing this relationship between entropy and accuracy play out in a device much larger than a quantum clock has given the researchers confidence that their findings could be universal. By counting every flex up and down as a tick, the team showed that more powerful electrical signals made the clock tick more regularly and accurately, but at the cost of adding more heat - and therefore more entropy - to the system. To test this idea, the researchers built a simplified clock made up of a 50-nanometer-thick, 1.5-millimeter-long membrane stretched between two tiny posts that they vibrated with pulses of electricity. That means you need to invest in entropy production." "In order to get that regular tick, tick, tick, you have to get the machine going. "Clocks are in some way like little steam engines - you need to put work into them to measure time," Ares said, where the “work is the energy transfer needed to make mechanical devices like clocks run. But until now, it has been very difficult to prove that larger, more mechanically complex clocks create more entropy the more accurate they get, even if the idea sounds good in theory. Physicists have been able to prove that a tiny quantum clock - a type of atomic clock that uses laser-cooled atoms that jump at highly regular intervals - creates more disorder the more accurately it measures time. Machines, such as clocks, also produce entropy in the form of heat dissipated to their surroundings. This intimate connection between time and entropy has fascinated scientists for decades.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |